One Womans’ Perspective on Universal Basic Income (This is an unedited rough draft, ramblings. It is not finished)

Or what about Biological Property Rights?

How about the idea of a Residual Income for mothers and teachers and children based on biological and intellectual property rights?  A percentage returned from our sweat equity on the child rearing investment to our little American Corporations, perhaps?

I have sat next to so many frustrated children, mothers, teachers.

I have sat in the classrooms of so many fantastic educators all over the country, whose very diverse backgrounds from each other separate our learning experience, capacity, resources, and environment and quite literally wrapped us up in our ability to grasp them and their conceptual thinking, apart from our own, to incorporate into ourselves and to process from their experiences and knowledge, what is valid for us and what is not as an individual.

The social security administration was supposed to be our nations version of sweat equity, but in order to be paid as a homemaker or a child you would have to be injured somehow, incapacitated to some extent.  But the program has been exploited and undermined and underfunded.

It feels like the country did it backwards and cannot see the err of their ways.

This woman thinks it’s time to flip this economy on its ass and let the children have a shot at true health.  Not the fit bit health, but like true activity and engagement, rather than entertainment and gadget. Fully funded.

But the first generation of this program gets stumped. and that’s okay because the SSA is still operational.  In this economic proposal, I am suggesting that the American Government consider the idea of Citizens United in a mathematical equation that is familiar to everyone.  A=B, B=A.  Let’s examine this:

A = Corporations and B = People.

so:

Corporations = People & People = Corporations

People begin as children.  Corporations begin as startups. (Get it, HEAD START)

So, as a woman I have given birth to 3 children, I have 3 startups.

The first child has very little income, with a lot of overhead costs.  However, this child is a hard worker a joyous learner and a pleasure to have within the environment, so his cultural capital is quite high.  He is sociable, but not overly so.  And quick!

I am the childs’ biological mother and the owner of this start up.  I literally incubated this business.  Then I delivered it to the world and nursed it from my own breast for 2.5 years, taught his preschool class, played t ball, soccer, basketball, Rollerblade, lots of studies, booboo kissing, in home chef, chauffeur services, data management, medical library and overall CEO leadership of this agency. A momager.

Then in steps some outside agency or force.  DA office for child support, they want their cut because you got food stamps for 3 months. It’s like the wicked stepsisters when they see Cinderella in her pretty dress made from scraps. Or here comes DHS or CPS right, because you’re too Christian or not Christian or you are too poor to be taken seriously at the stock market or worse you have a child with unique medical needs and they decide to medically kidnap your child.

and some other investor can see some sort of potential earnings and they want their cut. Slicing and dicing before a penny is made.

Like my beautiful and talented son being kidnapped by his 3x felon father and taken away from a poor college student and given to the dope dealer with money to throw at the judge in the form of bullshit.  Why was my investment cut short? because the army had to conceal the nature of the child’s birth. And they were being confronted with my physical reality of womanhood in America. Where the brilliant go to college to get married and the beautiful don’t have to but if they choose to they are rewarded with professors who appreciate their duality.

So we wish to Thank you for believing in us and begin to welcome you into the economy of family.  But in our model; we hope you don’t mind, we are the primary owner of our children , the biological property in question.  We are equipped to decide who shall assist us in educating our children and who isn’t.

And we will earn a percentage of stock in their corporation that begins with the mother at 51% stockholder in that child’s corporation. The Child at 30% of the stock holding. and the father or state or other assisting agency determined by the mother, which may include specific teachers, or colleagues, professionals, etc. purely at the discretion of the mother and child.

Thank you. That’s my take on Citizens United = Basic income for all.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

And speaking directly to my children, the children around my children, and the children from the various programs when I was teaching –

You are loved.